The
challenge every Chancellor faces is finding the right balance between wise
management of the economy and meeting the expectations of the voters.
In
2010, George Osborne took charge of the economy with an unsustainable national
debt and budget deficit.
He
promised to eliminate the latter by 2015 but failed because the tax rates and
cuts in public spending to do this were harsher than the voters would accept.
After
May’s election, he repeated his promise to eliminate the deficit, now by 2019 and this once again would require major cuts in public spending, including £12
billion from the welfare budget.
Inevitably,
the Opposition attacked his plan to cut the tax credits that are crucial for
the poorest, even if they are in work.
On
Wednesday 25th November 2015, he prudently cancelled that plan until
tax credits are phased out with the nationwide implementation of the Universal
Benefit, expected to be by 2020.
In
his Autumn Statement he also responded to voter expectations by allocating an
additional £10 billion per year to the NHS; scrapping any further cuts to
police budgets, as well as protecting the defence, overseas aid and education
budgets.
All
this was possible because other Whitehall departments took heavy hits to their
budgets.
More
important, was the apparently ‘surprise discovery’ that increased tax revenues
and lower than expected interest payments on Government borrowing gave him £27
billion more to disperse than expected, in his March budget.
All
this thrilled his backbenchers and won Osborne a good press but it did not
impress the Shadow Chancellor who claimed credit for the U turn on tax credit
cuts and complained that 14,000 of those already receiving the Universal Credit
would still suffer the full cut.
He
accused Osborne of ‘incompetence and poor judgement’, but blunted his attack by
quoting Mao’s ‘Little Red Book’ and by giving the Chancellor his own signed
copy, to the embarrassment of Labour MPs.
Nevertheless,
there are serious questions Osborne must face.
How
real is the £27 billion pot the Office for Budget Responsibility has
fortuitously found?
If
tax receipts don’t increase and interest payments do not remain as modest as
they expect, the 2019 target could be missed like the 2015 target.
Underlying
the Chancellor’s plans is an assumption that the British economy will continue
to grow robustly, but productivity is still poor and our major Eurozone markets
remain weak.
Household
debt is still too high and interest rates may need to be raised to cool
consumer demand and If, as Osborne has repeatedly claimed, ‘we are all in this
together’, delaying the end of tax credits is welcome from a social justice
perspective, but questionable if he is gambling with the nation’s finances in
his bid to be Cameron’s heir apparent.
Another
question is how the costs of providing for the 20,000 refugees the Government
is committed to accepting, will be met; there was no mention of this in the
Statement.
The
tension between what we citizens expect and wise economic policies, is one
Christians should understand.
We
will experience personally it as the tension between self-interest and loving
our needier neighbours, James 2:14-16 comes to mind.